Zuckerberg’s unwillingness to enforce its policies, while Republicans are embracing an executive order handed down by President Trump that could make tech companies - including, and especially, Facebook - liable for the content that appears on their platforms. Zuckerberg’s attempts to avoid the political fray face additional challenges. In discussions posted to the company’s internal message boards and privately between employees on Friday, workers wondered what the final breaking point will be for Facebook to enforce its rules evenly, according to three people familiar with the company’s internal deliberations. Some have long believed that a double standard applies to conservatives on the platform. Both companies have said they would take down posts, even from a president, if they contained threats and incitement to violence or attempts to suppress voter turnout or citizens’ ability to participate in elections.Ĭourting conservatives seems to have helped Facebook in Washington, but the strategy has not been entirely embraced by the company’s employees. In truth, Facebook’s and Twitter’s rules are not all that different. A spokesman for Twitter declined to comment. They believe bad speech will be countered by good speech and that is what Zuckerberg is saying he will do.”įacebook did not immediately comment on Friday. “Republicans want social media to be a pass-through, a billboard. “Twitter is doubling down and they are showing how amazingly bad they are at the politics on this,” said Rachel Bovard, a senior adviser to the conservative Internet Accountability Project and a former aide to Republican senators Mike Lee of Utah and Rand Paul of Kentucky. Zuckerberg declared that political speech would be protected on Facebook, including lies made by politicians on the site. In a speech at Georgetown University in October 2019, Mr. Zuckerberg, who controls a far larger internet megaphone than Mr. That kind of confrontation is exactly what Mr. Zuckerberg is still unwilling - or unable - to own up to his company’s role in disseminating information to the world, particularly when many news organizations are collapsing. It could also infuriate some of the company’s Silicon Valley work force, who still believe Facebook isn’t doing enough to counter misinformation campaigns.Īnd it could lend more ammunition to critics who say Mr. Trump’s increasingly incendiary behavior on social media runs the risk of alienating some users who think the rules about what can be posted to Facebook should be applied equally to everyone, including world leaders. “Zuckerberg said, ‘We trust people to make up their minds.’”īut Mr. “Zuckerberg’s instincts have been right,” said Brendan Carr, a Republican commissioner at the Federal Communications Commission. Many people in the tech industry believe regulators - not economic collapse brought on by the coronavirus pandemic or any other problem - are the one existential risk to Mr. A Top Misinformation Spreader: A large study found that Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast had more falsehoods and unsubstantiated claims than other political talk shows.A Key Case: The outcome of a federal court battle could help decide whether the First Amendment is a barrier to virtually any government efforts to stifle disinformation.Cutting Back : Job cuts in the social media industry reflect a trend that threatens to undo many of the safeguards that platforms have put in place to ban or tamp down on disinformation.Deepfakes : Meme-makers and misinformation peddlers are embracing artificial intelligence tools to create convincing fake videos on the cheap.The Spread of Misinformation and Falsehoods Zuckerberg, who, in an interview a day earlier with Fox News, said Facebook wasn’t going to judge Mr. Jack Dorsey, chief executive of Twitter, took to his site not long after to say Twitter would not back down, presenting a stark contrast to Mr. Facebook didn’t do anything when the same post was added to its service. The company said the tweet had the potential to incite violence amid protests in Minneapolis. Twitter’s face-off escalated Friday morning, when the company attached an addendum to one of Mr. Trump posted the same words on Facebook, which has similar rules around voter suppression. The company said the president violated rules regarding voter suppression. Trump’s tweets criticizing mail-in voting. On Tuesday, Twitter added a fact-check link to one of Mr. SAN FRANCISCO - Earlier this week, as Twitter executives waded into a confrontation with President Trump, Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive of Facebook, took a very different tack: He kept his head down.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |